Contact Us

View Cart

Subscribe to Our Newsletter &
Get Loads of FREE Lean Content!

Archived for the ‘Continuous Improvement Articles’ Category

The standard work process is a critical piece in the implementation of Lean manufacturing programs. It helps to stabilize a process and it provides a basis for continuous improvement. No matter how good something is, though, there is always a cost to it. For standard work, the price can come in the form of hard feelings and subsequent lack of engagement that it can cause in some employees.

In fact, the same aspect of standard work can raise job satisfaction for some people and reduce it for others. Why? Because people are unique. For example, those who love predictability and structure thrive under the standard work process. But those who are more independent, free spirits dislike feeling micromanaged and resent feeling forced to do their work in specific ways.

So, how can leaders make standard work more appealing to employees? A good way to start is to make sure that standard work is structured in a way that it makes it easy for team members to get help when they need it.

Let’s assume that the manufacturing managers are doing a lot of things right:

  • there are andon lights in place to call for assistance, and teams are encouraged to use them
  • there is a defined sequence of events that happens when the lights are turned on
  • leaders enforce the process, and make sure people respond as required
  • there are team leaders who can float and offer assistance when help is needed

Despite these efforts, employees may still perceive that they are not getting the help that they need when there is a problem on the shop floor. Big problems tend to get a lot of attention, but often the hiccups that frustrate employees are the little things that cost a few minutes here and there.

This is about the small problems that seem to randomly occur in Lean production. A screw gets cross-threaded. A bolt gets dropped into a hard-to-access place. Murphy (remember Murphy’s Law–what can go wrong, will) loves to hang out on the shop floor.

The frustrating part for an employee comes when there is no way to get help to get back on track. Even if someone from a support team shows up immediately, an extra set of hands (if standard work is improperly structured) might not be able to speed things up. Frequently, the helper comes to assist and can do little more than watch, offer advice, or get tools for a person. None of these things will, in most cases, prevent a disruption to production.

Instead, standard work should be arranged so that an assistant can show up and jump right into a task to keep things flowing. It is much easier to do than you might imagine.

The goal is to simply structure the process so that the last few tasks are independent of the rest of the work. That means:

  • Put all multi-operator work first. That way, if one person falls behind, the other person won’t get her work flow out of sync.
  • Put the most complicated tasks first, so if there is a problem, the operator can light the andon as early as possible.
  • Don’t put all the independent work at the same station. For example, instead of having one station apply all the decals to a product at the end of an assembly line, spread the work out among the stations. That work likely can be done at any time, and gives a floater something to do when he shows up.
  • Put the tasks with the lowest quality parts first. If a part is bad, there is time to get a replacement. If it is identified right before a line shifts, there is little time to resolve the problem. (Of course, if you know about an ongoing problem, you should also be working to fix it.)
  • Start with all sub-assemblies completed. Finish the cycle by building the subs for the next line shift. If an operator falls behind, an assistant can come over and build the subs, buying time for the operator.
  • Make sure tools are available for the assistant to work at the same time as the operator. The helper should not have to wait around because a $5 tool is not available.
  • The assistant should be trained in the support task. She has to be able to step right in seamlessly. She should practice these tasks for every station she supports, so there is never any hesitation, and no risk of poor quality.

With these fairly simple steps, the employees working in production jobs can feel like they are supported. This will make the pace seem more manageable if they feel like there is a pressure valve (that works!) when things get a little hairy. If employees feel supported, they are much more likely to support the standard work process in return.

Add a Comment

Share Your Thoughts    |No comments|

 

Establishing Standards

 

How Using Incentives Helps

Many years ago, when I was a lieutenant in the Army, I was responsible for a motor pool—a military word for a glorified lot where the unit parked its forty trucks when they weren’t in use.

Every Friday afternoon, my sergeants and I managed the cleanup of the motor pool. As I am sure you can imagine, the 18 and 19 year old soldiers were ready to start their weekend. They were less than enthusiastic about pushing brooms and picking up trash. Despite them being a great group of soldiers, they needed some close supervision to make sure they met the standard by quittin’ time.

That is, until someone came up with a stroke of genius. We decided to let the soldiers go as soon as the motor pool passed an inspection.

The first time we tried this, we ran into a problem that you might expect. ‘Clean’ meant one thing to me as the person responsible for the area and something else entirely to a teenager who was trying to get off work for a night on the town. So, we quickly set about establishing standards and making up a clear list of expectations about what ‘clean’ meant.

Very quickly, the motor pool started meeting the standard in less time. Eventually, on their own, this team of soldiers helped each other out and started using their free time during the week to get the motor pool spotless. Pretty soon, we were not doing any cleanup at all on Fridays, because it was kept clean all week long.

We, as the leaders, got the necessary result and the soldiers got something very desirable as well. Everybody won.

How does this story apply to establishing standards in Lean? Well, what if managers used some innovative thought in how they approached improvement targets? For example, let’s say a team made 10 go-carts a day in January, with a target of getting that up to 12 by the end of the year. In a traditional model, leadership might have a challenge trying to sell the idea that each person had to be more productive. In an incentive model, if the team knew that soon as they got to 12 a day they could go home early, I’d bet that the target would be reached well before December. Of course, the team would start with a new baseline the following January, and have another new improvement target.

There would certainly be some specific issues to address. You’d have to figure out who was eligible (i.e. what about the engineering team, or the materials team?) and answer a bunch of legal questions. You’d also have to set the rules about quality, backsliding, how it applies to a new hire brought on the team late in the year, and a bunch of other things. But, those are all just details to be worked out.

The point is that people always work harder and are more creative at problem solving if they have something to gain too. And they are more committed to following established standards if they see some of the benefit on a personal level.

Do you have experience with incentives? How well has it worked in your area?

 

 

 

Jeff-Hajek-Blue-Background

Jeff Hajek - Founder

 

Succeed on the Front Line of Lean!

This is the book that's been missing from your Lean library. It's a two part 'how to' guide for those that face the challenges of practicing Lean principles every day.

Make sure you--and your team--have the tools to succeed in Lean.

Learn More About Whaddaya Mean I Gotta Be Lean?

AWARD-WINNING finalist in the 2009 National Best Books Awards and rated 5 Stars on Amazon.com

 


 

Did you find this article helpful? If so, please support this free resource by clicking the ‘Share/Save’ button at the bottom of this post to let other people know about it. And don’t forget to subscribe to my Gotta Go Lean Blog and Maximize Your Lean Success Newsletter.

 

 

 

 

 

© 2009-2011 by Velaction Continuous Improvement, LLC. All rights reserved.

 

Didn’t find what you needed?

View the Lean Dictionary

Search Our Lean Dictionary

Go to Velaction's Homepage

Get The Continuous Improvement Companion

 

Add a Comment

Share Your Thoughts    |No comments|

 

Implementing Kaizen

 

How Late Should Kaizen Teams Work?

Great Lean practitioners and change agents know the same thing about implementing kaizen that a carpenter does about his trade. You have to use the right tool for the right job. When building cabinets, a woodworker relies on tools other than his hammer.

Lean companies should look to tools other than the week-long kaizen project when implementing Lean. Unfortunately, for many people, kaizen, has become synonymous with ‘five day improvement event’. These projects may also be known as Kaizen Blitzes, Rapid Improvement Workshops, or something similar.

Common sense dictates that there will also be some projects that need more than a week to resolve; some will need less. It follows that a single tool won’t be right for every situation.

In truth, the term kaizen doesn’t just refer to week-long projects. It also means the practice of making a change for the better. Week-long projects are one way of implementing kaizen. On the spot improvements, or individual projects are others. Perhaps a work area is chronically messy. Simply marking a location and placing a trash can in the area is kaizen.

Week-long kaizen events, though, are popular because they create big gains in a short time. They also are outstanding educational tools and are great for building up improvement networks. Employees meet people who can help with later improvement efforts—tooling people, engineers, programmers, maintenance workers, and the like.

So what’s the problem? When a company ignores other methods, and only uses week long kaizen weeks, the importance of these projects to Lean success becomes exaggerated. As a result, the project sponsor, or Lean champion, tends to push for huge gains. These expectations greatly exceed what can be done in a 40 hour work week, often leading to long nights.

Is there anything wrong with working late like that? For some people, the answer is no. When a project is clicking, and you are moving machines around late at night, the time flies by. For other people, though, it can be a problem.

If the people in a compan equate kaizen to a hardship, they will not want to participate.

In the modern world, families with two working parents or a single parent are commonplace. It can be challenging them to put in long hours. Other employees might avoid project teams because they have personal commitments like evening classes, coaching baseball teams, or the like. Some workers will just not want to stay late. Even those that don’t mind staying late on occasion will get tired of it after having to do several projects in a four or five month period.

So, the strategy of only using week-long projects when implementing kaizen creates a division in a company of ‘haves’ and ‘have-nots’: those that have participated in kaizen weeks and everyone else.

This division doesn’t take into account whether or not the worker supports Lean efforts. An employee with schedule conflicts may be lumped together with workers who have been avoiding project weeks because they are resisting change. All of this can create conflict among workers and between employees and managers, making Lean harder than it needs to be.

A better way is to approach implementing kaizen weeks is to use them as one facet of a broad continuous improvement effort. If you shift your focus to daily improvements instead, two things happen.

First, if an improvement affects the team on a personal level, more employees will be motivated to get involved. Involvement leads to commitment. Commitment increases the success of your Lean efforts.

Second, company leadership won’t feel the same degree of pressure on every project, so the chance of an improvement workshop week running until all hours becomes more of an exception rather than a rule.

Reach for daily improvements first in your Lean tool box to maximize the success of your Lean efforts.

 

Jeff-Hajek-Blue-Background

Jeff Hajek - Founder

 

Succeed on the Front Line of Lean!

This is the book that's been missing from your Lean library. It's a two part 'how to' guide for those that face the challenges of practicing Lean principles every day.

Make sure you--and your team--have the tools to succeed in Lean.

Learn More About Whaddaya Mean I Gotta Be Lean?

AWARD-WINNING finalist in the 2009 National Best Books Awards and rated 5 Stars on Amazon.com

 


 

Did you find this article helpful? If so, please support this free resource by clicking the ‘Share/Save’ button at the bottom of this post to let other people know about it. And don’t forget to subscribe to my Gotta Go Lean Blog and Maximize Your Lean Success Newsletter.

 

© 2009-2011 by Velaction Continuous Improvement, LLC. All rights reserved.

 

Didn’t find what you needed?

View the Lean Dictionary

Search Our Lean Dictionary

Go to Velaction's Homepage

Get The Continuous Improvement Companion

 

Add a Comment

Share Your Thoughts    |No comments|

 

Internal Suppliers

 

Measuring the Support You Get

Whether you are in Lean manufacturing or in a Lean office, you will be relying on external and internal suppliers to support you – information technology (IT), materials, maintenance, the print shop, design engineering, tooling, accounting, etc.

The Problem:

These internal suppliers all have many jobs, but sometimes you believe that they don’t think supporting you is one of them.

Action to take:

Make a list of all the teams that support you—your internal suppliers—and write down how they help you. Now, think about all the ways their support is measured. If your company is like many, support won’t be a primary role for these teams, so you won’t see many measures in place.

If things aren’t going well, before you let your frustration get out of hand, remember that they do have their other primary jobs to do as well. Design engineers are rolling out new products, in addition to supporting your team with design changes. Manufacturing engineers have to figure out new tools and get ready for product releases, but they also have to respond to andon (warning) lights. Information technology folks have to update systems, manage backups, and keep the networks going—the act of writing programs for your improvement projects is extra work for them.

To measure how well these groups support your area, you will need the support of the person in charge. If you are not the boss, approach your manager and suggest to her that you want to put some metrics in place, and ask her to coordinate those measurements with the other groups. If your manager is not overly responsive to your request, you could talk to a trusted human resources rep, drop a note in the corporate suggestion box, or find that really bold coworker who will ask a question for you at a company meeting. The idea is to get the ball rolling on putting metrics in place for the support groups.

If the support teams, or internal suppliers, don’t agree to measurements, it doesn’t really matter. The great thing about suppliers is that you don’t really need their permission to measure them. If the support group chooses not to track relevant data, your team will just have to do it.

Work with your manager to post a metrics board for all the support groups that help you out, and track their performance. The data should be posted out in the open, so anyone who comes into the area can see it. A cautionary note: this should be done delicately and with your boss’s permission, since it has the potential to inflame poor relationships. Just remember, though, the poor relationship is the reason for this tactic, not the cause of it.

Posting metrics without an internal supplier’s cooperation should be used as a last resort, and with tact. As an example, suppose your company has an escalation policy when an andon light is turned on. At some point, a manufacturing engineer would probably be required to respond. They are always busy somewhere, so you might get late response or no support at all. Regardless, try to remain positive, even as you are starting to track their performance. Instead of saying that the engineers are unresponsive, say that they are so busy they can’t react in a timely manner. Don’t go down the path of bad-mouthing the people you need on your side.

Why this works:

Support teams get away with far worse service than any external vendor could. Imagine if your company hired a consultant who barely showed up or if a supplier frequently shipped late. Businesses are far more forgiving of internal suppliers than they are of contractors that they hire. Establishing metrics will likely clarify your expectations. Equally as important, though, they will transform an emotional issue (You’re not helping enough!) into a fact (You have only been on time 37.2 percent of the time.)

Most support groups take pride in their work. It doesn’t take long for conditions to improve when support groups see their numbers (that paint them in an unflattering light) posted in public places. Once performance improves, your boss can use the posted metrics as an opportunity to recognize the support team’s gains.

Posting metrics works for three reasons. First, it sends a message that you are serious about wanting good support. After all, you will be spending a lot of effort collecting and posting data. Second, it adds a little pressure – most people want to do well. Once metrics are posted (and remember, you are already being measured so you are not doing anything to them that you are not doing to yourself), people are often moved to action. Finally, many groups are not used to daily measures. Sometimes they benefit from a little assistance in getting accustomed to it.



More ‘Continuous Improvement Strategies’ like this one are available to our registered users. (Look under ‘Categories’ in the navigation bar at the top of the page to find them.) Don’t worry—registration is free.

You can also download the Whaddaya Mean I Gotta Be Lean? Excerpts to learn more about this book.

Thanks for reading.

This article was extracted from Whaddaya Mean I Gotta Be Lean? It comes from over 100 strategies on how to deal with some of the obstacles that teams face when implementing Lean.

 

Jeff-Hajek-Blue-Background

Jeff Hajek - Founder

 

Succeed on the Front Line of Lean!

This is the book that's been missing from your Lean library. It's a two part 'how to' guide for those that face the challenges of practicing Lean principles every day.

Make sure you--and your team--have the tools to succeed in Lean.

Learn More About Whaddaya Mean I Gotta Be Lean?

AWARD-WINNING finalist in the 2009 National Best Books Awards and rated 5 Stars on Amazon.com

 


 

Did you find this article helpful? If so, please support this free resource by clicking the ‘Share/Save’ button at the bottom of this post to let other people know about it. And don’t forget to subscribe to my Gotta Go Lean Blog and Maximize Your Lean Success Newsletter.

 

© 2009-2011 by Velaction Continuous Improvement, LLC. All rights reserved.

 

Didn’t find what you needed?

View the Lean Dictionary

Search Our Lean Dictionary

Go to Velaction's Homepage

Get The Continuous Improvement Companion

 

Add a Comment

Share Your Thoughts    |No comments|